Ex Parte Avery Cato v. the State of Texas
This text of Ex Parte Avery Cato v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Avery Cato v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00730-CR
Ex parte Avery Cato
FROM THE 453RD DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-23-5794-D-HC-1, THE HONORABLE SHERRI TIBBE, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Avery Cato has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s denial of
his pro se pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. The clerk’s record filed in this cause
contains no signed written order, only a docket sheet with the November 4, 2024 entry:
“D’s writ of habeas corpus is denied.” See Dewalt v. State, 417 S.W.3d 678, 685 n.32 (Tex.
App.—Austin 2013, pet. ref’d) (recognizing that docket sheet entries do not qualify as
appealable orders); State v. Cox, 235 S.W.3d 283, 285 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.)
(“It is well settled that a docket sheet entry is not an order.”). On December 6, 2024,
we requested that the trial court file a supplemental clerk’s record containing its order
denying appellant’s habeas application. However, the supplemental clerk’s record filed on
December 11, 2024 contained only a copy of the docket sheet.
“A written and signed appealable order is a prerequisite to invoking this Court’s
appellate jurisdiction.” Dewalt, 417 S.W.3d at 685 n.32; see Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1); State v. Rosenbaum, 818 S.W.2d 398, 402 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Ortiz v. State, 299 S.W.3d 930,
933 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, no pet.); Cox, 235 S.W.3d at 285. The lack of a signed written
order is curable: we treat the notice of appeal as prematurely filed, abate the appeal, and remand
the case to the trial court for preparation of an appealable order. Dewalt, 417 S.W.3d at 685 n.32
(citing Tex. R. App. P. 27.1(b); State v. Rollins, 4 S.W.3d 453, 454 & n.1 (Tex. App.—Austin
1999, no pet.)).
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for entry
of a signed written order on appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. R. App.
P. 44.4(b) (requiring appellate court to direct trial court to correct remediable error that prevents
proper presentation of appeal). A supplemental clerk’s record containing the signed order shall
be prepared and filed with this Court no later than January 17, 2025. See Tex. R. App. P.
34.5(c)(2).
It is ordered on December 31, 2024.
Before Justices Baker, Smith, and Theofanis
Abated and Remanded
Filed: December 31, 2024
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Avery Cato v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-avery-cato-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.