Ex parte Austin Apparel, Inc.

872 So. 2d 167, 2003 Ala. LEXIS 233, 2003 WL 21949732
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided August 15, 2003·No. 1021341·Published

Opinion

HOUSTON, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

We note that in quoting from the loan agreement, the Court of Civil Appeals omitted pertinent language. The phrase “to the extent permitted by applicable law” appears immediately before the words “for environmental consultants” in paragraph 15 of the loan agreement. Austin Apparel, Inc. v. Bank of Prattville, 872 So.2d 158 (Ala.Civ.App.2003). We considered this language in denying the petition for the writ of certiorari.

WRIT DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and LYONS, JOHNSTONE, and WOODALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Austin Apparel, Inc., 872 So. 2d 167, 2003 Ala. LEXIS 233, 2003 WL 21949732 (Ala. 2003).

872 So. 2d 167 (Ex parte Austin Apparel, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)
Austin Apparel, Inc. v. Bank of Prattville
872 So. 2d 158 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2003)