Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line R.
This text of 279 U.S. 822 (Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon examination of the returns to the nile to show cause, the Court finds that the reasons [823]*823given by the respondent, the District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, that the case is likely to become moot, are not sufficient to justify his failure, immediately upon application, to call to his assistance, to hear and determine the application, two other judges, in accord with the provisions for direct review by this Court of the District Court, under § 4 of 238 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925, c. 229, 43 Stat. 936. See Virginian Ry. v. United States, 272 U. S. 658, 672. And the rule against the respondent is made absolute, and directed to be certified to him for due observance thereof. We assume it will not be necessary to issue a formal writ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 U.S. 822, 49 S. Ct. 478, 73 L. Ed. 977, 1929 U.S. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-atlantic-coast-line-r-scotus-1929.