Ex parte Armstrong

24 P. 598, 84 Cal. 655, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 860
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 8, 1890
DocketNo. 20720
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 24 P. 598 (Ex parte Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Armstrong, 24 P. 598, 84 Cal. 655, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 860 (Cal. 1890).

Opinion

The Court.

The charter of the town of Berkeley was granted by special act of the legislature before the adoption of the present constitution. It provided for the election of two justices of the peace for the municipality. The only question in this case is, whether or not this provision of the charter has been repealed by the adoption of the constitution, and the general legislation had under it. It is conceded that there is no such repeal in express terms. We think there is none by necessary implication. Justices’ courts in municipalities are inferior courts which may be created by act of the legislature, and the fact that the legislature in the general judiciary article of the Code of Civil Procedure has provided for the number of justices in cities of over ten thousand inhabitants, but said nothing about the number in municipalities of a less population, shows that it was not the intention of the legislature to interfere, by that act, with existing charters of municipalities of the latter class. The provisions of the general law for the incorporation of municipalities on this subject differ for the different classes of such corporations, and apply to them only when they have surrendered or abandoned their old charters, and elected to incorporate under such general law.

Writ discharged, and prisoner remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus Cases
35 Nev. 80 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1912)
People Ex Rel. McConnell v. City of Wilmington
91 P. 524 (California Supreme Court, 1907)
Ex Parte Helm
77 P. 453 (California Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 P. 598, 84 Cal. 655, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-armstrong-cal-1890.