Ex Parte Armando Ramos v. .

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 23, 2021

No. 04-21-00203-CR

EX PARTE ARMANDO RAMOS,

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR6442-W1 Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On December 22, 2021, appellant pro se filed “Appellant’s Memorandum and Request for the Record” and “Appellant’s Second Objection to Appeal Court’s Shuffling of Attorney’s Without Notification and Request for Notification-Extension of Time and Ander’s Requirement’s.” Because appellant is represented by an attorney on appeal, the motions are DENIED on the basis that appellant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Unless required by law, further pro se filings will not be considered.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of December, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court