Ex Parte Andrew Garcia Jr. v. the State of Texas
This text of Ex Parte Andrew Garcia Jr. v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Andrew Garcia Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued September 23, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00433-CR ——————————— EX PARTE ANDREW GARCIA JR., Appellant
On Appeal from the 185th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1891362
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Andrew Garcia Jr., currently incarcerated and proceeding pro se,
attempts to appeal the denial of his post-conviction application for writ of habeas
corpus. We dismiss the appeal.
On October 26, 2009, a jury convicted appellant of the felony offense of
murder and assessed punishment at confinement for seventy years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division. This Court affirmed the
trial court’s judgment on March 10, 2011. See Garcia v. State, No.
01-09-00958-CR, 2011 WL 846244, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 10,
2011, pet. dism’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). The mandate
subsequently issued on January 9, 2013.
The appellate record reflects that on October 22, 2024, appellant, proceeding
pro se, filed a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court.
On May 14, 2025, the trial court denied appellant’s post-conviction application for
writ of habeas corpus. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s denial
of his post-conviction habeas application on June 3, 2025.
Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final
post-conviction felony proceedings, and we have no authority to review the trial
court’s denial of appellant’s post-conviction habeas application. See TEX. CODE
CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241,
243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (concluding Court of Criminal Appeals has “exclusive
authority . . . to grant post[-]conviction [habeas] relief”); see also Ex parte Payne,
No. 01-22-00636-CR, 2023 WL 3010957, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
Apr. 20, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Jackson v. State,
No. 01-22-00040-CR, 2023 WL 3357645, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
May 11, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
2 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. All pending
motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justice Guerra, Guiney, and Johnson.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Andrew Garcia Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-andrew-garcia-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.