Ex Parte Amir Tavakkoli

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 4, 2013
Docket09-13-00082-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Amir Tavakkoli (Ex Parte Amir Tavakkoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Amir Tavakkoli, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00082-CR ____________________

EX PARTE AMIR TAVAKKOLI

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 12-26808 ________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

Counsel of record for Amir Tavakkoli filed a motion for leave to withdraw

as counsel. Although he signed the notice of appeal as counsel of record for the

appellant, counsel informs the Court that he has not been retained for the appeal.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeal is abated and the case is

remanded to the trial court for the purpose of determining whether counsel should

be allowed to withdraw as counsel on appeal. The trial court shall determine

whether appellant has retained new counsel for the appeal. If the trial court

determines that counsel of record should be allowed to withdraw, and that

1 appellant has not retained new counsel for the appeal, the trial court shall

determine whether the appellant is indigent and shall determine whether counsel

should be appointed, in which case the trial court may appoint new counsel for the

appeal unless the trial court admonishes appellant as to the dangers of self-

representation on appeal and determines that appellant’s decision to relinquish the

benefits associated with counsel and to proceed pro se is knowingly and

intelligently made. All appellate timetables are suspended pending resolution of

this matter in the trial court. A supplemental clerk’s record containing any orders

and findings made by the trial court pursuant to this Order, together with a

reporter’s record of any hearings conducted by the trial court, shall be filed with

the Court of Appeals by May 6, 2013.

ORDER ENTERED April 4, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Amir Tavakkoli, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-amir-tavakkoli-texapp-2013.