Ex Parte Alfred West, Jr. v. the State of Texas
This text of Ex Parte Alfred West, Jr. v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Alfred West, Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00661-CR
EX PARTE Alfred WEST, Jr.
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Adrian A. Spears, II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 22, 2025
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DISMISSED
Petitioner filed his original petition for writ of habeas corpus in this court on October 15,
2025. Petitioner seeks habeas relief in a criminal law matter.
Intermediate courts of appeal do not have original habeas jurisdiction in criminal law
matters. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (original habeas jurisdiction of the courts of
appeals is limited to cases in which a person’s liberty is restrained because they violated an order,
judgment, or decree entered in civil case); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. ART. 11.05
(granting exclusive jurisdiction to consider original petitions for writs of habeas corpus to the court
of criminal appeals, the district courts, county courts, and judges sitting on such courts). The
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 24-0857-CR-A, styled State of Texas v. Alfred West, Jr., pending in the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Jessica Crawford presiding. 04-25-00661-CR
Court’s jurisdiction to consider habeas petitions in criminal matters is appellate only. TEX. GOV’T
CODE ANN. § 22.221(d). As such, we lack jurisdiction in this matter. Id.; In re Neal, 653 S.W.3d
346, 346 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2022, orig. proceeding); In re Spriggs, 528 S.W.3d 234, 236 (Tex.
App.—Amarillo 2017, orig. proceeding).
The Court, having considered the petition, the record, and applicable law, concludes that
we lack jurisdiction to issue the requested relief. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d); In re
Neal, 653 S.W.3d at 346; In re Spriggs, 528 S.W.3d at 236. Accordingly, we DISMISS this
original proceeding for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Alfred West, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-alfred-west-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.