Ex parte Albitz

15 S.W. 173, 29 Tex. Ct. App. 128, 1890 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 101
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 18, 1890·No. No. 3486·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WILLSON, Judge.

In our judgment the proof is not evident that the applicant is guilty of a capital offense, and we hold that he is entitled to bail. We fix the amount of his bail at the sum of $5000. Upon his giving bail in said sum in accordance with the law he will be released from custody.

We are of the opinion that the statements made by applicant to C. V. Fraley two or three minutes after the homicide, and relating to the homi[132]*132cide, constitute res gestee, and are admissible in his behalf. His statements to Michaelson, however, made several months before the homicide,, are not, we think, admissible in his behalf.

Ordered accordingly.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Albitz, 15 S.W. 173, 29 Tex. Ct. App. 128, 1890 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 101 (Tex. Ct. App. 1890).

15 S.W. 173 (Ex parte Albitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaines v. State
127 S.W. 181 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)