Ex Parte Alberto Garcia

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 8, 2014
Docket03-14-00292-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Alberto Garcia (Ex Parte Alberto Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Alberto Garcia, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00292-CR

Ex parte Alberto Garcia

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-04-900606-A, THE HONORABLE P. DAVID WAHLBERG, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Alberto Garcia has filed a pro se notice of appeal of the trial court’s

“adverse ruling entered March 31, 2014,” referring to the trial court’s findings of fact and

recommendation for the denial of relief entered in response to appellant’s application for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See Tex. Code

Crim. Proc. art. 11.07 (procedure for application for writ of habeas corpus).

Article 11.07 vests complete jurisdiction over post-conviction relief from final felony

convictions in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. § 5; Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel.

Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Ex parte

Williams, 239 S.W.3d 859, 862 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.); see also Padieu v. Court of

Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The intermediate courts

of appeals have no jurisdiction in criminal law matters pertaining to proceedings initiated under

article 11.07. See Smith v. State, No. 03-13-00680-CR, 2013 WL 6002779, at *1 (Tex.

App.—Austin Nov. 6, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication); In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d 196 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d

715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding); cf. Padieu, 392 S.W.3d at

117–18.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.1

__________________________________________ J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: August 8, 2014

Do Not Publish

1 We also note that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied relief on appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus on April 23, 2014, one week before the instant notice of appeal was filed in this Court. See Official Site of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=WR-81,186-01 (last visited July 28, 2014).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Briscoe
230 S.W.3d 196 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Board of Pardons & Paroles Ex Rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District
910 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
In Re McAfee
53 S.W.3d 715 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Ex Parte Williams
239 S.W.3d 859 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Padieu, Philippe, Relator v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 5th District
392 S.W.3d 115 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Alberto Garcia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-alberto-garcia-texapp-2014.