Ex Parte Addington

76 So. 6, 200 Ala. 414, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 423
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided February 15, 1917·No. 6 Div. 459.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

The court denies the writ in this case on the ground that the only debatable question presented for review is a question of fact. This court has uniformly refused to consider such questions. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 71 South. 91, 1 and the cases there cited. Having considered the record of the facts in this case, the writer is of the 'opinion that the determination of the Court of Appeals in the matter of the general charge requested by defendant should be reconsidered. His general view of the subject was stated in a dissenting opinion in McNeil v. Munson S. S. Lines, 184 Ala. 424, 63 South. 992. It need not be repeated, for the court thinks that that water has passed under the bridge, and in this view the writer has acquiesced for lack of anything better to do.

Judge THOMAS concurs with the writer.

Application denied.

All the Justices concur.
1

195 Ala. 420.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Addington, 76 So. 6, 200 Ala. 414, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 423 (Ala. 1917).

76 So. 6 (Ex Parte Addington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Addington v. State
77 So. 993 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)