Ex parte Adams

192 So. 2d 456, 43 Ala. App. 449, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 551
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 29, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 So. 2d 456 (Ex parte Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Adams, 192 So. 2d 456, 43 Ala. App. 449, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 551 (Ala. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

October 11, 1966, Adams filed an application for an original writ of mandamus to speed up the Mobile Circuit Court. Adams says he filed a petition there for a writ of error coram nobis August 5, 1966, which he avers allows (i. e., until October 11) “a legal and reasonable amount of time” before asking for mandamus.

We forego a discussion as to what period of time must lapse before a court must act. Rather, since no averment is made that the judgment sought to be scrutinized by coram [450]*450nobis would have been appealable to this court, we rest our decision on the statute which limits our power to issue writs of mandamus. See Ex parte Goodman, 43 Ala.App. 183, 185 So.2d 146.

The petition is hereby

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Argo v. State
195 So. 2d 901 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 So. 2d 456, 43 Ala. App. 449, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-adams-alactapp-1966.