Ex Parte Adam Ahmad Noureddine v. the State of Texas
This text of Ex Parte Adam Ahmad Noureddine v. the State of Texas (Ex Parte Adam Ahmad Noureddine v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00655-CR
Ex parte Adam Ahmad Noureddine
FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 78979, THE HONORABLE STEVEN J. DUSKIE, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant’s brief was originally due January 17, 2025, in this appeal of an
order denying an application for a writ of habeas corpus under Code of Criminal Procedure
article 11.072. On January 30, this Court sent a notice to Appellant—at the last known address for
him, drawn from his most recent filing as shown in the clerk’s record—informing him that his
brief was overdue and that we required a response by February 10. It appears that this Court’s
notices to Appellant’s last known address have been returned without having reached Appellant.
Also, the clerk’s record in this appeal contains a document titled “Trial Court’s
Certificate of Defendant’s Right to Appeal.” It appears, however, that this certificate may be
defective because an order denying habeas as here is an appealable order. See Ex parte Saylee,
No. 03-18-00124-CR, 2018 WL 1833533, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 17, 2018, no pet.) (per
curiam) (order & mem. op., not designated for publication). Because the certification appears not to accurately reflect Appellant’s right of appeal, it is defective. Id. (citing Dears v. State,
154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)).
The appeal is abated and the case remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall
conduct a hearing to determine whether Appellant desires to prosecute this appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If Appellant expresses his desire to dismiss this appeal, the trial court shall
direct Appellant to submit a motion to dismiss with this Court that complies with Rule of Appellate
Procedure 42.2. The court shall make appropriate written findings and recommendations. See
Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If necessary, the court should appoint counsel who will effectively
represent Appellant in this appeal. Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial
court shall order the appropriate supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all
findings, conclusions, and orders, if any—to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than
30 days from the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).
Also on remand, the trial court should sign an amended certification that accurately
reflects Appellant’s right to appeal the denial of his habeas application. Once entered, the
certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed with this Court no later
than 30 days from the date of this order.
It is ordered on July 11, 2025.
Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Theofanis
Abated and Remanded
Filed: July 11, 2025
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Adam Ahmad Noureddine v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-adam-ahmad-noureddine-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.