Ewoldt v. Robinson
243 F. App'x 553
Opinion
We affirm on the basis of our decision in McMahan v. Toto, 256 F.3d 1120 (11th Cir.2001), modified, 311 F.3d 1077 (11th Cir.2002). Because the circumstances of this case are indistinguishable from McMahan, we agree with the district court’s finding that, based on our precedent, Florida Statute § 768.79 applies in this case.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ewoldt v. Robinson, 243 F. App'x 553 (11th Cir. 2007).
243 F. App'x 553 (Ewoldt v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McMahan v. Toto
311 F.3d 1077 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)