Ewoldt v. Robinson
243 F. App'x 553
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 18, 2007
DocketNo. 07-11079
StatusPublished
This text of 243 F. App'x 553 (Ewoldt v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ewoldt v. Robinson, 243 F. App'x 553 (11th Cir. 2007).
Opinion
We affirm on the basis of our decision in McMahan v. Toto, 256 F.3d 1120 (11th Cir.2001), modified, 311 F.3d 1077 (11th Cir.2002). Because the circumstances of this case are indistinguishable from McMahan, we agree with the district court’s finding that, based on our precedent, Florida Statute § 768.79 applies in this case.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McMahan v. Toto
311 F.3d 1077 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
243 F. App'x 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewoldt-v-robinson-ca11-2007.