Ewing v. State

114 S.W.2d 905, 134 Tex. Crim. 128, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 234
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 16, 1938
DocketNo. 19533.
StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.W.2d 905 (Ewing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ewing v. State, 114 S.W.2d 905, 134 Tex. Crim. 128, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 234 (Tex. 1938).

Opinion

Hawkins, Judge.

Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor in dry territory, punishment assessed at ninety days in jail.

In the transcript forwarded to this Court we find neither a judgment of conviction nor notice of appeal. See McCallan v. State, 112 Texas Crim. Rep. 173, 15 S. W. (2d) 1049, on necessity of judgment. On necessity of notice of appeal see Article 827, C. C. P. (1925), Vernon’s Ann. Texas C. C. P., Vol. 3, and cases cited thereunder.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCallan v. State
15 S.W.2d 1049 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.W.2d 905, 134 Tex. Crim. 128, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewing-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.