Ewing v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Ewing v. State

82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 419

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 19, 1910

DocketNo. 12138

StatusPublished

This text of 82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 419 (Ewing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ewing v. State, 82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 419 (Ohio 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed for error in affirming instead of reversing the judgment of the court of common pleas for error committed by said court of common pleas in overruling defendant’s motion made at the conclusion of the state’s evidence in chief, and renewed at the conclusion of all the evidence, to [420]*420direct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. And this court proceeding to render the judgment the circuit court should have rendered, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court of common pleas be and the same hereby is reversed and held for naught and the plaintiff in error, Emmett Ewing, is discharged.

Crew, Spear, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur. Price, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed for error in affirming instead of reversing the judgment of the court of common pleas for error committed by said court of common pleas in overruling defendant’s motion made at the conclusion of the state’s evidence in chief, and renewed at the conclusion of all the evidence, to [420]*420direct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. And this court proceeding to render the judgment the circuit court should have rendered, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court of common pleas be and the same hereby is reversed and held for naught and the plaintiff in error, Emmett Ewing, is discharged.

Crew, Spear, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur. Price, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewing-v-state-ohio-1910.