Ewing v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ewing v. State

544 S.W.3d 314

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 3, 2018

DocketED 105684

StatusPublished

This text of 544 S.W.3d 314 (Ewing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ewing v. State, 544 S.W.3d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Byron Ewing (Movant) appeals from the motion court's judgment dismissing Movant's motion to amend a 2012 judgment denying post-conviction relief under Mo. R. Crim. P. 29.15 (2012). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of the motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Byron Ewing (Movant) appeals from the motion court's judgment dismissing Movant's motion to amend a 2012 judgment denying post-conviction relief under Mo. R. Crim. P. 29.15 (2012). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of the motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

544 S.W.3d 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewing-v-state-moctapp-2018.