Ewing v. M'Connel

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Ewing v. M'Connel

8 Ky. 188

DecidedApril 13, 1818

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ky. 188 (Ewing v. M'Connel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ewing v. M'Connel, 8 Ky. 188 (Ky. Ct. App. 1818).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chief Justice

delivered the opinion of the court,

We are of opinion the circuit court decided correctly ⅛ refusing to sustain the application made by the appellants in ací‘oa for a new trial. The application was made on the, grounds of the want of preparation at the trial, and of the discovery of new matter of defence since (he trial. But a®^av‘ts upon which the application was made, neither £llew sufficient diligence in making preparation for the trial that vvas had, nor do they disclose any matter which would constitute an available defence on a second trial,

Judgment affirmed with cost,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chief Justice

delivered the opinion of the court,

We are of opinion the circuit court decided correctly ⅛ refusing to sustain the application made by the appellants in ací‘oa for a new trial. The application was made on the, grounds of the want of preparation at the trial, and of the discovery of new matter of defence since (he trial. But a®^av‘ts upon which the application was made, neither £llew sufficient diligence in making preparation for the trial that vvas had, nor do they disclose any matter which would constitute an available defence on a second trial,

Judgment affirmed with cost,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Ky. 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewing-v-mconnel-kyctapp-1818.