Ewing v. Fuller
This text of 7 D.C. 3 (Ewing v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
The court has come to the conclusion that the motion to dismiss must prevail. The question is not a new one, but has been several times decided by the court. ' The bill is filed avowedly for the purpose of dissolving a copartnership, and one of the copartners holding the fund the other prayed an injunction to prevent the disposal of the money, and for placing it in the hands of a receiver, which was granted, and thereupon an appeal was taken. We think the order appealed from is an interlocutory matter, and does not involve the merits of the controversy.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 D.C. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewing-v-fuller-dc-1869.