Ewing v. City of Toledo
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
WILLIAM EWING, Case No. 6:18-cv-01626-MK ORDER Plaintiff, Vv. CITY OF TOLEDO, CRAIG MARTIN, in his individual capacity, BILLIE JO SMITH, in her individual capacity, PAUL OSTERLUND, in his individual capacity, DAVID JAMES ROBINSON, - in his individual capacity, Defendants, AIKEN, District Judge. This Court previously stayed consideration of Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (““F&R”) (doc. 27) recommending that | defendant’s motion to dismiss (doc. 11) be GRANTED in part and DENIED pending supplemental briefing on Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.199. That briefing has been completed, and Magistrate Judge Kasubhai has issued a second F&R (doc. 37) recommending that this case be STAYED until 1) this Court receives notification from the parties that the Oregon Supreme Court has issued an opinion after its review of
Page 1 - ORDER
the Court of Appeals decision in Burley v. Clackamas County, 298 Or. App. 462 (2019); 2) the parties notify the Court that the Oregon Supreme Court declined review of the Court of Appeals decision; or 3) the parties notify the Court that the Burley defendant ultimately declined to petition the Oregon Supreme Court for review. This matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 686(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff has filed timely objections (doc. 42) to the F&R, and defendants have filed a timely response. (doc. 43). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge’s F&R, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge’s report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). Having reviewed the record, the Court finds no error in the F&R. The Court finds that it is in the best interest of this case and its companion case to issue a stay for the reasons outlined in the F&R. Thus, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s F&R (doc. 37) in its entirety. Consideration of the pending motions shall be administratively terminated until the stay is lifted. SO ORDERED. Dated this ie day of January 2020. Ds Uber Ann Aiken United States District Judge
Page 2 - ORDER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ewing v. City of Toledo (Ewing v. City of Toledo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.