Ewing O. Cossaboom v. George A. Eubanks, Members of Review Committee, Etc.

Sixth Circuit

Ewing O. Cossaboom v. George A. Eubanks, Members of Review Committee, Etc.

191 F.2d 855

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 18, 1951·No. 11293_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been heard and considered on the record and on the oral arguments and 'briefs of the attorneys for the respective parties;

And the findings of fact of the District Court being supported by substantial evidence and not clearly erroneous; the conclusions of law being correctly drawn; and the opinion of the district judge in support of his conclusion that appellants are not entitled to the relief sought by them in this proceeding being found logical and sound;

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been heard and considered on the record and on the oral arguments and 'briefs of the attorneys for the respective parties;

And the findings of fact of the District Court being supported by substantial evidence and not clearly erroneous; the conclusions of law being correctly drawn; and the opinion of the district judge in support of his conclusion that appellants are not entitled to the relief sought by them in this proceeding being found logical and sound;

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Ewing O. Cossaboom v. George A. Eubanks, Members of Review Committee, Etc., 191 F.2d 855 (6th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

191 F.2d 855 (Ewing O. Cossaboom v. George A. Eubanks, Members of Review Committee, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.