Ewing Bros. v. Bowser & Co.
89 S.E. 1052, 18 Ga. App. 521, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1085
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ewing Bros. v. Bowser & Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Ga. App. 305 →
Opinion
The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds only. The case is controlled by the former ruling of this court therein (14 Ga. App. 305, 80 S. E. 693), which is the law of the case, binding not only upon the lower court but upon this court. The case is clearly distinguishable on its facts from the ease of Oklahoma Vinegar Co. v. Carter, 116 Ga. 140 (42 S. E. 378, 59 L. R. A. 122, 94 Am. St. R. 112). -Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ewing Bros. v. Bowser & Co., 89 S.E. 1052, 18 Ga. App. 521, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1085 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
89 S.E. 1052 (Ewing Bros. v. Bowser & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oklahoma Vinegar Co. v. Carter & Ford
59 L.R.A. 122 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)