Ewing Bros. v. Bowser & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ewing Bros. v. Bowser & Co.

89 S.E. 1052, 18 Ga. App. 521, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1085

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 15, 1916

Docket7127

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E. 1052 (Ewing Bros. v. Bowser & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ewing Bros. v. Bowser & Co., 89 S.E. 1052, 18 Ga. App. 521, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1085 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds only. The case is controlled by the former ruling of this court therein (14 Ga. App. 305, 80 S. E. 693), which is the law of the case, binding not only upon the lower court but upon this court. The case is clearly distinguishable on its facts from the ease of Oklahoma Vinegar Co. v. Carter, 116 Ga. 140 (42 S. E. 378, 59 L. R. A. 122, 94 Am. St. R. 112). -Judgment affirmed,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, C. J.

The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds only. The case is controlled by the former ruling of this court therein (14 Ga. App. 305, 80 S. E. 693), which is the law of the case, binding not only upon the lower court but upon this court. The case is clearly distinguishable on its facts from the ease of Oklahoma Vinegar Co. v. Carter, 116 Ga. 140 (42 S. E. 378, 59 L. R. A. 122, 94 Am. St. R. 112). -Judgment affirmed,.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E. 1052, 18 Ga. App. 521, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewing-bros-v-bowser-co-gactapp-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack