Ewers v. Buffalo

162 F. 828, 89 C.C.A. 536, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4497
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 1908
DocketNo. 2,747
StatusPublished

This text of 162 F. 828 (Ewers v. Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ewers v. Buffalo, 162 F. 828, 89 C.C.A. 536, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4497 (8th Cir. 1908).

Opinion

PHILIPS, District Judge.

This case is the counterpart of that of C. D. Goodrum et al. v. Arthur Buffalo, a Minor, etc. (No. 2,746, just decided by this court) 162 Fed. 817. The only difference of note in the facts is that the lands here in question were allotted to Mary Joseph, a Quapaw Indian, who was the wife of John Medicine, named in said case No. 2,746, through whom the lands in question descended to Arthur Buffalo, defendant in error.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in case No. 2,746, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals in the Indian Territory is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodrum v. Buffalo
162 F. 817 (Eighth Circuit, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 F. 828, 89 C.C.A. 536, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewers-v-buffalo-ca8-1908.