Ewell v. Ward

California Court of Appeal

Ewell v. Ward

71 Cal. App. 800

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 20, 1925

DocketCiv. No. 5150

StatusPublished

This text of 71 Cal. App. 800 (Ewell v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ewell v. Ward, 71 Cal. App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

KNIGHT, J.

The matters presented by the petition filed herein for a writ of certiorari are discussed and decided in the opinion in Ex parte Ewell, ante, p. 744 [236 Pac. 205], and for the reasons therein stated the petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

Tyler, P. J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on April 18, 1925, and petitioner’s application to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 18, 1925.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KNIGHT, J.

The matters presented by the petition filed herein for a writ of certiorari are discussed and decided in the opinion in Ex parte Ewell, ante, p. 744 [236 Pac. 205], and for the reasons therein stated the petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

Tyler, P. J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on April 18, 1925, and petitioner’s application to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 18, 1925.

All the Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 Cal. App. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewell-v-ward-calctapp-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack