Ewell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ewell v. State

267 S.W. 1115, 99 Tex. Crim. 24, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 788

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 17, 1924

DocketNo. 9022.

StatusPublished

This text of 267 S.W. 1115 (Ewell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ewell v. State, 267 S.W. 1115, 99 Tex. Crim. 24, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 788 (Tex. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted upon his trial in the district court of Cherokee county under an indictment for murder, of the offense of aggravated assault, and his punishment fixed at eighteen months in the county jail.

Appellant was indicted for killing one Jessie Green by striking him with a base-ball bat and upon the trial and under the charge of the learned trial judge the jury found him guilty and assessed his penalty as above indicated. We find in the record no bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment is in conformity with law and the charge of the court correctly submits the issues, and there being no error apparent in the record, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted upon his trial in the district court of Cherokee county under an indictment for murder, of the offense of aggravated assault, and his punishment fixed at eighteen months in the county jail.

Appellant was indicted for killing one Jessie Green by striking him with a base-ball bat and upon the trial and under the charge of the learned trial judge the jury found him guilty and assessed his penalty as above indicated. We find in the record no bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment is in conformity with law and the charge of the court correctly submits the issues, and there being no error apparent in the record, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 S.W. 1115, 99 Tex. Crim. 24, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewell-v-state-texcrimapp-1924.