Ewell v. . Southard
105 N.E. 1096, 211 N.Y. 559, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1150
This text of 105 N.E. 1096 (Ewell v. . Southard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ewell v. . Southard, 105 N.E. 1096, 211 N.Y. 559, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1150 (N.Y. 1914).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Werner, Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Miller and Oardozo, JJ. Not voting: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
105 N.E. 1096, 211 N.Y. 559, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewell-v-southard-ny-1914.