Ewbank, Trustee v. Yellow Cab Co.

149 N.E. 647, 84 Ind. App. 144, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 165
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 20, 1925
DocketNo. 12,181.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 149 N.E. 647 (Ewbank, Trustee v. Yellow Cab Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ewbank, Trustee v. Yellow Cab Co., 149 N.E. 647, 84 Ind. App. 144, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 165 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Enloe, J.

This was an action for an injunction and for damages sustained as to certain described real estate. Upon the trial the court made a special finding of the facts and stated conclusions of law thereon, favorable to the appellees. Damages were awarded to the appellants in the sum of one dollar, and the injunction asked for was denied. From this decree, this appeal is prosecuted upon an assignment of error which challenges the conclusions of law stated by the trial court.

The facts as found by the trial court are, in substance, as follows: That the appellants, as trustees under the will of Volney T. Malott, are the owners in fee simple of the south half of lot ten (10) in Morris’ subdivision of square eighty-seven (87), in the original plat of Indianapolis, being the south thirty-three (33) feet of said lot; that located on said ground is a three-story brick building, known as the Fair Building; that in the first story of said building are six (6) store rooms, all fronting to the south; that on the second floor of said building are office rooms, and on the third floor are *147 office and living rooms; that the only way of entrance to the rooms on the second and third floors of said building is by way of the entrance located in the center of said building, east qnd west, and opening upon the sidewalk, which is twelve feet in width, and which immediately adjoins said building upon the south; that said building is occupied by tenants to the number of from twenty-five to thirty; and that located in said rooms on the first floor of said building are stores, a restaurant and a barber shop.

It was also found that in the subdivision of said square eighty-seven, an alley, twelve feet in width, was located immediately south of the premises now owned by appellants, and extended from Illinois street eastward to what is now McCrea street; that in June, 1885, the Indianapolis Union Railway Company, which was then owner of the ground, dedicated to the public, for street purposes, a strip of ground thirty-eight (38) feet in width, extending from Illinois street eastward to what is now McCrea street, and that said strip so dedicated and said original alley, twelve feet in width, are now and since said dedication have been known as “Jackson Place street,” the same being, in front of said building, of the width of fifty (50) feet; “that immediately south of said part of Jackson Place street which lies south of appellants’ said building is located the grounds and buildings of the Indianapolis Union Railway Company; that the ground immediately south of said Jackson Place street is occupied by sidewalks, at the east and west sides, and that for a distance of over 100 feet east and west through the center is an open paved driveway of a width of more than fifty feet north and .south, which is used as a driveway approach to the main entrance of the Indianapolis Union Steam Railway Station, and which open paved driveway is called ‘Jackson Place.’ ”

*148 It was further found that in May, 1923, the Common Council of the city of Indianapolis enacted an ordinance in reference to the parking of taxi-cabs and therein provided that, in the congested district of the city, taxicabs could park, or establish stands, at certain designated places, and one of the places designated in said ordinance where they might so park, or establish a stand was, “on the north side of Jackson Place, between Illinois street and McCrea street," with a provision that they should not park within fifty feet of either of said streets.

It was further found that the appellees, Yellow Cab Company, Black and White Cab Company, Frank Bird Transfer Company, Checkered Taxi-Cab Company, and James Hooper, James Schloff and William H. McLaughlin, doing business under the name of “Diamond Cab Company” were, and for some time prior to the bringing of this suit had been, using about ninety feet, east and west, of the space on the north side of the roadway of Jackson Place street and immediately along the south line of the curb and sidewalk along the south side of appellants’ building, and extending from a point fifty feet east of Illinois street to a point about fifty feet west of the west curb of McCrea street, as a taxi-cab stand, for the purpose of parking taxi-cabs thereon while awaiting patronage, and for soliciting patronage, and have solicited patronage from persons upon the street and sidewalk, and also have used said space for the purpose of awaiting telephone calls, and that there are and have been in said space, continually, day and night, from one to twelve or fourteen taxi-cabs so standing, awaiting and soliciting patronage for hire; that the average of taxi-cabs so standing at said place, day and night, is six or seven; and that the presence of said taxi-cabs and said taxi-cab stand has decreased the rental value of appellants’ building.

*149

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. ENSLEY
164 N.E.2d 342 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1960)
People v. Galena
70 P.2d 724 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
McRoberts v. Vogel
195 N.E. 417 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1935)
Woodsmall v. Carr Tire Co.
185 N.E. 163 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1933)
City of Indianapolis v. Link Realty Co.
179 N.E. 574 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1932)
Lowell v. Pendleton Auto Co.
261 P. 415 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 N.E. 647, 84 Ind. App. 144, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ewbank-trustee-v-yellow-cab-co-indctapp-1925.