Ewald v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
449 U.S. 914, 101 S. Ct. 311, 66 L. Ed. 2d 143, 49 U.S.L.W. 3288, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 3566, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,300, 23 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1844
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 20, 1980·No. No. 80-208·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U. S. 807 (1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ewald v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 449 U.S. 914, 101 S. Ct. 311, 66 L. Ed. 2d 143, 49 U.S.L.W. 3288, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 3566, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,300, 23 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1844 (1980).
449 U.S. 914 (Ewald v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. Burroughs Corp.
621 F. Supp. 660 (E.D. Arkansas, 1985)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ocean City Police Department
617 F. Supp. 1133 (D. Maryland, 1985)
Soble v. University of Maryland
572 F. Supp. 1509 (D. Maryland, 1983)
Rasimas v. Michigan Department of Mental Health
714 F.2d 614 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)
Van Atta v. Kal-Aero, Inc.
555 F. Supp. 912 (W.D. Michigan, 1983)
Curto v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
552 F. Supp. 891 (N.D. Illinois, 1982)
Boothe v. New York Ass'n for the Blind
524 F. Supp. 736 (S.D. New York, 1981)
Eugene B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HEUBLEIN, INC. and Heublein International Division of Heublein, Inc., Defendants-Appellants
645 F.2d 127 (Second Circuit, 1981)