Ewald v. Ewald

219 Mass. 111
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 24, 1914·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

Sheldon, J.

We do not find it necessary to determine whether there was a valid marriage between these parties. The petitioner rests her case upon the allegation that she acted with the deliberate intention of evading the laws of this Commonwealth, in which she was and has continued to be resident. She not only comes-into court with unclean hands, but she makes her wrongful conduct the very ground of her application for relief from its consequences. The court will leave her in the position in which she has chosen to place herself.

It is true that there has been some contrariety of decision as to this question in different courts; but we prefer to follow the rule laid down in a somewhat similar case in New Jersey and by the Supreme Court of New York in a case upon all fours with this. Rooney v. Rooney, 9 Dick. 231. Kerrison v. Kerrison, 60 How. Pr. 51. The question was fully examined in the former of these two cases, with a sufficient citation of authorities; and we are content to rest upon that decision.

The order dismissing the petition must be affirmed.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ewald v. Ewald, 219 Mass. 111 (Mass. 1914).

219 Mass. 111 (Ewald v. Ewald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crease v. Crease
608 N.E.2d 738 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1993)
Poor v. Poor
409 N.E.2d 758 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1980)
Gerrig v. Sneirson
183 N.E.2d 131 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1962)
Fraser v. Fraser
133 N.E.2d 236 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1956)
Smith v. Smith
111 A.2d 531 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1955)
Korostynski v. Korostynski
101 N.E.2d 356 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1951)
Belcher v. Belcher
88 N.E.2d 344 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1949)
Coe v. Coe
69 N.E.2d 793 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1946)
Vital v. Vital
65 N.E.2d 205 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1946)
Taylor v. Ashe
187 N.E. 548 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Pierce Coach Lines, Inc.
183 N.E. 836 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Payzant v. Payzant
168 N.E. 168 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Heflinger v. Heflinger
118 S.E. 316 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1923)
Gardner v. Gardner
122 N.E. 308 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1919)
Chapman v. Chapman
224 Mass. 427 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Rubenstein v. Lottow
220 Mass. 156 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1915)