Ewald Iron Co. v. Commonwealth

134 S.W. 481, 142 Ky. 465, 1911 Ky. LEXIS 215
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided February 24, 1911·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Extended opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson.

[466]*466_ In fixing two years as a reasonable time for a corporation to close up its business, the court followed the statute regulating the settlement of the estates of deceased persons. (Ky. St., sections 3858-59.) The corporation expired for business purposes on November 5, 1905. The property held in its name should be taxed in its name and as its property until November 5, 1907; after that time it should be taxed in the name of L. P. Ewald, and as his property. It is important in these tax matters that a definite rule be laid down that the parties may conform to it and avoid litigation cost and penalties.

The former opinion, 140 Ky., 692, is extended as above indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ewald Iron Co. v. Commonwealth, 134 S.W. 481, 142 Ky. 465, 1911 Ky. LEXIS 215 (Ky. Ct. App. 1911).

134 S.W. 481 (Ewald Iron Co. v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Courier Journal Job Printing Co. v. Glenn
37 F. Supp. 55 (W.D. Kentucky, 1941)
Highbaugh v. Huff
265 S.W. 816 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1924)
Commonwealth v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.
215 S.W. 42 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1919)
Smith v. Commonwealth Land & Lumber Co.
189 S.W. 912 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1916)
Ewald's v. City of Louisville
181 S.W. 1095 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1916)
Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. Van Winkle
221 F. 590 (Sixth Circuit, 1915)