E.W. v. State
550 So. 2d 1182, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2535, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6074, 1989 WL 129145
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 1989·No. No. 88-625·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court acted within the bounds of sound discretion in excluding certain of respondent’s statements which had not been disclosed to the defense in discovery. Other statements about which respondent complains were actually made known to the defense in pretrial deposition. The procedure followed by the trial court was consistent with Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E.W. v. State, 550 So. 2d 1182, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2535, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6074, 1989 WL 129145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
550 So. 2d 1182 (E.W. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Solomon v. Betras Plastics, Inc.
550 So. 2d 1182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)