E.W. Bowman, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
825 A.2d 1251, 573 Pa. 411, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 1008
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:
In a case of first impression, whether the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that Section 306(c)(8)(vi) is inapplicable to an insurer, thereby rendering a decision in conflict with Brown v. Travelers Insurance Company, 434 Pa. 507, 254 A.2d 27 (1969)?
In a case of first impression, whether the Commonwealth Court erred in resurrecting the “last injurious exposure rule” by imposing liability upon Vigilant based upon the date of injury established by Section 306(c)(8)(ix) irrespective of evidence of causation?
The Petition for Leave to File Supplemental Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED.
The Petition for Supersedeas is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E.W. Bowman, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 825 A.2d 1251, 573 Pa. 411, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 1008 (Pa. 2003).
825 A.2d 1251 (E.W. Bowman, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Travelers Insurance
254 A.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)