Evyan Perfumes, Inc. v. Hamilton
This text of 12 A.D.2d 593 (Evyan Perfumes, Inc. v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, entered on March 16, 1960, denying, among other things, plaintiffs’ motion to disqualify defendant’s former attorneys of record from representing defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs to any of the parties. Upon the record and upon the statements made in open court by defendant’s counsel, defendant and his attorneys are directed not to consult in any manner with defendant’s former counsel in connection with this pending lawsuit. Motion for a stay dismissed, having become academic by virtue of the decision of this court herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 A.D.2d 593, 210 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evyan-perfumes-inc-v-hamilton-nyappdiv-1960.