Evyan Perfumes, Inc. v. Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Evyan Perfumes, Inc. v. Hamilton

12 A.D.2d 593, 210 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6660

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 6, 1960·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, entered on March 16, 1960, denying, among other things, plaintiffs’ motion to disqualify defendant’s former attorneys of record from representing defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs to any of the parties. Upon the record and upon the statements made in open court by defendant’s counsel, defendant and his attorneys are directed not to consult in any manner with defendant’s former counsel in connection with this pending lawsuit. Motion for a stay dismissed, having become academic by virtue of the decision of this court herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on March 16, 1960, denying, among other things, plaintiffs’ motion to disqualify defendant’s former attorneys of record from representing defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs to any of the parties. Upon the record and upon the statements made in open court by defendant’s counsel, defendant and his attorneys are directed not to consult in any manner with defendant’s former counsel in connection with this pending lawsuit. Motion for a stay dismissed, having become academic by virtue of the decision of this court herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.

Evyan Perfumes, Inc. v. Hamilton, 12 A.D.2d 593, 210 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

12 A.D.2d 593 (Evyan Perfumes, Inc. v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related