E.V.V. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

E.V.V. v. State

631 So. 2d 359, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 760, 1994 WL 34078

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 1994·No. No. 93-1542·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

E.V.V. appeals an order adjudicating him delinquent for theft. We conclude (a) that there was no violation of the best evidence rule, § 90.952, Fla.Stat. (1991); (b) that there was no abuse of discretion with respect to the Richardson¹ hearing; (c) that there was no Brady² violation, see Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 109 S.Ct. 333, 102 L.Ed.2d [360]*360281 (1988); and (d) that the motion for judgment of acquittal was properly denied.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

E.V.V. appeals an order adjudicating him delinquent for theft. We conclude (a) that there was no violation of the best evidence rule, § 90.952, Fla.Stat. (1991); (b) that there was no abuse of discretion with respect to the Richardson¹ hearing; (c) that there was no Brady² violation, see Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 109 S.Ct. 333, 102 L.Ed.2d [360]*360281 (1988); and (d) that the motion for judgment of acquittal was properly denied.

Affirmed.

E.V.V. v. State, 631 So. 2d 359, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 760, 1994 WL 34078 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

631 So. 2d 359 (E.V.V. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related