Evora v. Martin

Fourth Circuit

Evora v. Martin

131 F. App'x 964

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 2005

DocketNo. 05-6158

StatusPublished

This text of 131 F. App'x 964 (Evora v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evora v. Martin, 131 F. App'x 964 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Juan G. Evora appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Evora v. Superintendent, No. CA-04-549-3 (E.D.Va. Jan. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Juan G. Evora appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Evora v. Superintendent, No. CA-04-549-3 (E.D.Va. Jan. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 F. App'x 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evora-v-martin-ca4-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack