EVISLANDYS BRITO vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of EVISLANDYS BRITO vs STATE OF FLORIDA (EVISLANDYS BRITO vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
EVISLANDYS BRITO,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D21-3214 LT Case No. 2005-CF-016201-A-O
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Decision filed July 12, 2022
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Luis Fernando Calderon, Judge.
Evislandys Brito, Daytona Beach, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
COHEN, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
EVISLANDYS BRITO vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evislandys-brito-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.