Evins F. Glore & Son v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Evins F. Glore & Son v. Rose

229 A.D. 709

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 229 A.D. 709 (Evins F. Glore & Son v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evins F. Glore & Son v. Rose, 229 A.D. 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

In view of the amendments proposed by respondents to the case on appeal, the application for an extension of time made by appellants does not now appear unreasonable. The motion for reargument is granted and upon reargument the appellants’ time is extended until May 1, 1930. But no matter what difficulties arise, no further time to perfect the appeal will be granted. Present — Dowling, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman; JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In view of the amendments proposed by respondents to the case on appeal, the application for an extension of time made by appellants does not now appear unreasonable. The motion for reargument is granted and upon reargument the appellants’ time is extended until May 1, 1930. But no matter what difficulties arise, no further time to perfect the appeal will be granted. Present — Dowling, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman; JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evins-f-glore-son-v-rose-nyappdiv-1930.