Evideo Owners v. United States

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

EVIDEO OWNERS, MAURO DIDOMENICO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED, DOUGLAS BUERGER, CRAIG LINDEN, REALVIRT LLC, PAUL BAROUS, Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________

2016-2149 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:15-cv-00413-LKG, Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby. ______________________

Decided: March 13, 2017 ______________________

PATRICK RICHARD DELANEY, Ditthavong & Steiner, P.C., Alexandria, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

NICOLAS RILEY, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MARK R. FREEMAN, BENJAMIN C. MIZER; NATHAN KELLEY, Office of 2 EVIDEO OWNERS v. US

the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA. ______________________

Before MOORE, O’MALLEY, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. For the reasons articulated in the decision by the United States Court of Federal Claims, we affirm. We order Appellants to show cause within fifteen days why sanctions should not be imposed for a frivolous appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38. AFFIRMED COSTS Costs to Appellee.