Evgenii Ivanov v. David R Rivas, et al.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedMarch 23, 2026
Docket2:25-cv-04160
StatusUnknown

This text of Evgenii Ivanov v. David R Rivas, et al. (Evgenii Ivanov v. David R Rivas, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evgenii Ivanov v. David R Rivas, et al., (D. Ariz. 2026).

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Evgenii Ivanov, No. CV-25-04160-PHX-SHD (ASB) 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 David R Rivas, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed 16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Magistrate Judge to whom this case was referred 17 issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the Petition be denied and 18 dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend within thirty (30) days. (Doc. 19 11.) The time for filing objections has run, and neither party filed objections. 20 This Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 21 recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is “clear that 22 the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de 23 novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 24 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. 25 Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that 26 de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 27 otherwise.’”); see also Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Ctr. v. U.S. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 28 589 F.3d 1027, 1032 (9th Cir. 2009) (the district court “must review de novo the portions 1 || of the [Magistrate Judge’s] recommendations to which the parties object”). District 2|| courts are not required to conduct “any review at all... of any issue that is not the || subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (emphasis added); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“[T]he court shall make a de novo determination of those || portions of the [report and recommendation] to which objection is made.”’). 6 No objection having been filed, 7\| IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) is accepted; the 8 || Petition is DENIED and DISMISSED, without prejudice, and with leave to amend. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is granted leave to file an Amended || Petition within thirty (30) days of this Order. The Amended Petition must include all 11 || claims Plaintiff wishes to allege and all of the allegations that the claims are based upon, 12 || even if previously presented in the original Petition. No part of the original Petition may 13 || be incorporated by reference. If the Amended Petition fails to cure the defects identifiec in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 11), or if Petitioner fail |} to submit an Amended Petition on the court-approved form within 30 days from th date of this Order, the Court may dismiss without further leave to amend. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Petitioner fails to file an Amended Petition 18 || within 30 days of the date of this Order, the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice, without further notice to the Petitioner. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of the current court-approved form for filing a “Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of 22 || Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody” to Petitioner. 23 Dated this 23rd day of March, 2026. 24 □ 25 / 26 27 H le Sharad H. Desai United States District Judge

-2-

Instructions for Filing a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1. Who May Use This Form. If you are detained in Arizona, you may use this form to challenge your detention by federal immigration authorities or to challenge the execution of your federal sentence by the United States Bureau of Prisons. You are asking for release or earlier release on the grounds that your detention or future detention violates the United States Constitution or other federal law. You should not use this form to challenge a state or federal judgment of conviction or sentence. If you are challenging a conviction or sentence entered against you by a state court, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you are challenging a judgment of conviction or sentence entered by a federal court, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. Any claim that may be brought or has already been brought in a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 may not be brought using this form unless it appears that the § 2255 motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of your detention. This form should not be used in death penalty cases. If you were sentenced to death, you are entitled to the assistance of counsel and you should request the appointment of counsel. 2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.5(a) provides that habeas corpus petitions must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages. The form, however, must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. You do not need to cite law. If you want to file a brief or arguments, you must attach a separate memorandum. 3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury. 4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $5.00. If you are unable to pay the filing fee, you may request permission to proceed in forma pauperis by completing and signing the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis provided with the petition form. You must have an official at the prison or jail complete the certificate at the bottom of the application form. If the amount of money in your account exceeds $25.00, you must pay the $5.00 filing fee. LRCiv 3.5(b). 5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your petition and of any other document submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten. 6. Where to File. You should file your petition in the division where you are detained. See LRCiv 5.1(a). If you are detained in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, you should file your petition in the Phoenix Division. If you are detained in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, you should file your petition in the Prescott Division. If you are detained in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, you should file your petition in the Tucson Division. See LRCiv 5.1(b) and 77.1(a). Mail the original and one copy of your petition with the $5.00 filing fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Ysiem Corp. v. Commercial Net Lease Realty, Inc.
328 F.3d 20 (First Circuit, 2003)
Sponge Exch. Bank v. Commercial Credit Co.
263 F. 20 (Fifth Circuit, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Evgenii Ivanov v. David R Rivas, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evgenii-ivanov-v-david-r-rivas-et-al-azd-2026.