Eves v. Eves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eves v. Eves

262 A.D.2d 446, 691 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6629

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 446 (Eves v. Eves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eves v. Eves, 262 A.D.2d 446, 691 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated May 6, 1997, and in which the defendant former husband’s application dated March 2, 1998, for a modification of the custody provision of the judgment was settled by an in-court stipulation, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered June 8, 1998, which granted the application of the plaintiff former wife for counsel fees incurred in connection with the defendant’s modification application and awarded her the sum of $7,020.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order entered June 8, 1998, did not decide a motion made upon notice and is not appealable as of right (see, CPLR 5701 [a]). No application has been made for permission to appeal, and we are not inclined to grant leave to appeal under the circumstances of this case (see, Sherwood v Roper, 237 AD2d 275; Matter of Hartman v Smith, 207 AD2d 345). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated May 6, 1997, and in which the defendant former husband’s application dated March 2, 1998, for a modification of the custody provision of the judgment was settled by an in-court stipulation, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered June 8, 1998, which granted the application of the plaintiff former wife for counsel fees incurred in connection with the defendant’s modification application and awarded her the sum of $7,020.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order entered June 8, 1998, did not decide a motion made upon notice and is not appealable as of right (see, CPLR 5701 [a]). No application has been made for permission to appeal, and we are not inclined to grant leave to appeal under the circumstances of this case (see, Sherwood v Roper, 237 AD2d 275; Matter of Hartman v Smith, 207 AD2d 345). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 446, 691 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eves-v-eves-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack