Eves v. Davison-Paxon Co.
This text of 161 S.E. 275 (Eves v. Davison-Paxon Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In order “to set aside a judgment for defendant’s absence by reason of providential cause, it must be shown, not only that he was absent for such cause, but that he was unable to notify the court of his condition. Where it is sought to set aside a judgment by reason of the absence of the defendant and his attorney on account of the serious illness of the attorney, who had agreed to notify the defendant to appear, but who was prevented from so, doing by such illness, it should appear that the attorney was unable to notify the court of his condition.” Sims v. Sims, 135 Ga. 439 (2), 442 (69 S. E. 545) ; Brown v. Yereloas, 164 Ga. 733 (139 S. E. 344) ; Mason v. Stevens Warehouse Co., 43 Ga. App. 375 (158 S. E. 631).
2. Upon application of the above rulings to the facts of this case, the evidence did not demand a finding in the defendant’s favor upon her motion to set aside the judgment against her.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 S.E. 275, 44 Ga. App. 322, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eves-v-davison-paxon-co-gactapp-1931.