Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, Inc. v. Defcad, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 7, 2022
Docket1:21-cv-08704
StatusUnknown

This text of Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, Inc. v. Defcad, Inc. (Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, Inc. v. Defcad, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, Inc. v. Defcad, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND, INC.,

Plaintiff(s), STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT

AND PROTECTIVE ORDER - against -

Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-8704 DEFCAD, INC.; ODYSEE USER XYEEZYSZN; DEFCAD USER XYEEZYSZN; ODYSEE USER THEGATALOG- PRINTABLEMAGAZINES; THE GATALOG; DEFCAD USER FREEMAN1337; TWITTER USER XYEEZYSZN; PHILLIP ROYSTER.

Defendant(s).

PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.: WHEREAS, all the parties to this action (collectively the “Parties” and individually a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action (“Action”); WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Order –– including without limitation the Parties to this action (including their respective corporate parents, successors, and assigns), their representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties

providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or constructive notice of this Order — will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: 1. With respect to “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) that a person has designated as “Confidential” pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as this Order expressly permits: 2. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (“Producing Party”) may designate as Confidential only the portion of such material that it

reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: (a) previously non-disclosed financial information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, sales reports, and sale margins); (b) previously non-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non-public company; (c) previously non-disclosed business plans, product-development information, or marketing plans; (d) any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or (e) any other category of information this Court subsequently affords confidential status. 3. With respect to “Discovery Material” that a person has designated “Highly

Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to this Order, unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Producing Party, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material to anyone else except those listed infra at 9 (c)-(i), and the following: (a) House Counsel: attorneys are who are employees of a party to this Action or are employees of Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund working on this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel; and (b) Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to

this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 4. The Party or person producing or disclosing Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material may designate as Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: (a) Highly sensitive trade secret or proprietary business information (b) Commercially sensitive technical or financial information (c) Information containing business policy or strategic planning (d) Information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual, including but not limited to personal identifying information or information tending to lead to the discovery of personal identifying information Any Discovery Material produced by a non-Party shall automatically be deemed “Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material” until seven (7) days after it is produced to all counsel in order to afford the opportunity for a Party to make a designation under this Order. Any Information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual, including but not limited to personal identifying information or information tending to lead to the discovery of personal identifying information, that is obtained through the use of designated material falling under Paragraph 4(d) (hereinafter “Additional information”) shall carry the same designation and restrictions as the material used to obtain such Additional Information. 5. With respect to the Confidential or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” or Highly “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” the protected portion in a

manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility; and (b) producing for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the confidential or highly confidential information redacted. 6. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential Discovery Material or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information Governed by Protective Order “ or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their

control as directed by the Producing Party or that person’s counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only. 7. If at any time before the trial of this action a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously produced without limitation, the Producing Party may so designate such material by so apprising all prior recipients in writing. Thereafter, this Court and all persons subject to this Order will treat such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material as Confidential or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.

8. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence. 9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, Inc. v. Defcad, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everytown-for-gun-safety-action-fund-inc-v-defcad-inc-nysd-2022.