Everything Electric, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance Company
This text of 52 F.3d 332 (Everything Electric, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
52 F.3d 332
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
EVERYTHING ELECTRIC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-56620.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 5, 1995.*
Decided April 10, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-93-03822-LEW; Laughlin E. Waters, District Judge, Presiding.
Before: NOONAN, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Lee v. Schmidt-Wenzel, 766 F.2d 1387, 1389 (9th Cir.1985); see also Smith v. Phillips, 881 F.2d 902, 904 (10th Cir.1989).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F.3d 332, 1995 WL 217016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everything-electric-inc-v-transcontinental-insuran-ca9-1995.