Everything Electric, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance Company

52 F.3d 332, 1995 WL 217016
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 1995
Docket93-56620
StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.3d 332 (Everything Electric, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Everything Electric, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance Company, 52 F.3d 332, 1995 WL 217016 (9th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

52 F.3d 332
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

EVERYTHING ELECTRIC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-56620.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 1995.*
Decided April 10, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-93-03822-LEW; Laughlin E. Waters, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: NOONAN, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Lee v. Schmidt-Wenzel, 766 F.2d 1387, 1389 (9th Cir.1985); see also Smith v. Phillips, 881 F.2d 902, 904 (10th Cir.1989).

DISMISSED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), Ninth Circuit R. 34-4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 F.3d 332, 1995 WL 217016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everything-electric-inc-v-transcontinental-insuran-ca9-1995.