Everything Electric, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance Company

52 F.3d 332, 1995 WL 217016
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 10, 1995·No. 93-56620·Published

Opinion

52 F.3d 332
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

EVERYTHING ELECTRIC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-56620.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 1995.*
Decided April 10, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-93-03822-LEW; Laughlin E. Waters, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: NOONAN, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Lee v. Schmidt-Wenzel, 766 F.2d 1387, 1389 (9th Cir.1985); see also Smith v. Phillips, 881 F.2d 902, 904 (10th Cir.1989).

DISMISSED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), Ninth Circuit R. 34-4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Everything Electric, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance Company, 52 F.3d 332, 1995 WL 217016 (9th Cir. 1995).

52 F.3d 332 (Everything Electric, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related