Everson v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Everson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 Haw. 402
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 6, 2010·No. 29359·Published

Opinion

§§£Vl,‘$ ` ?YE4éH*M§§3§ OUMWM%Vw?

NO. 29359

§§ IN THE SUPREME coURT oF THE STATE oF HAWP;§:§Z:' :-:w,

,..~.-

§ *'4 MARlON EVERSON, JAMES DANNENBERG, BlLLY SOUTHW OD,

VALERlE YAMADA SOUTHWOOD, DUANE PREBLE, and SARAH PREBLE, Petitioners/Appellants-Appellees,

nn az we 9~ xvmzrfrz s

VS.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE HAWAfl EMPLOYER-UNION HEALTH BENEFlTS TRUST FUND, STATE OF HAWAFI, and The Administrator of the Hawafi Employer-Union Health Benefits Trust Fund, Respondents/Appellees-Appellants.

APPEAL FROM THE ClRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST ClRCUlT (ClV. NO. 07-l-l872)

ORDER DENYlNG/MOTlON TO CLARlFY d (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, and Duffy JJ., Circuit Judge Kim, in place of Recktenwald, J., recused, and Acoba, J., concurring separately) Upon consideration of Petitioners/Appellants-Appellees' motion to clarify footnotes l3, 14 and l6 of the court's opinion

filed on March 25, 20lO, the papers in support and opposition and the record herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, HawaiT4 20l0.

&QwL€…@M&@lQv gay .¢. z__'___

May 6,

ClI-l"\h§,i;

CONCURRENCE BY ACOBA, J.

1 concur with the majority’s denial of the motion to

clarify inasmuch as the motion concerns only the majority's

opinion.

Paul Alston, Eric G. Ferrer, Maren L. Calvert, and Jason H. Kim of Alston Hunt Floyd & lng and Charles K.Y. Khim for petitioners/appellants-appellees

Mark J. Bennett, Attorney General, Dorothy Sellers, Solicitor General, and Rebecca A. Copeland, Deputy Solicitor General, for respondents/ appellees-appellants

/@\-~»'§

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Everson v. State, (haw 2010).

Everson v. State (Everson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.