Everson v. Gehrman

New York Supreme Court

Everson v. Gehrman

2 Abb. Pr. 413

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1856

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Abb. Pr. 413 (Everson v. Gehrman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Everson v. Gehrman, 2 Abb. Pr. 413 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

Whiting, J.

Three of the defendants joined in an appeal from the special to the general term. The notice of appeal was signed by three different attorneys, and was of one appeal. The respondent’s attorneys were obliged to give notice to each of the attorneys, and although there was but one set of papers, one argument, and one judgment, he claims three separate and full bills of costs.

I think there was but one appeal, and the respondent is entitled to but one bill of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whiting, J.

Three of the defendants joined in an appeal from the special to the general term. The notice of appeal was signed by three different attorneys, and was of one appeal. The respondent’s attorneys were obliged to give notice to each of the attorneys, and although there was but one set of papers, one argument, and one judgment, he claims three separate and full bills of costs.

I think there was but one appeal, and the respondent is entitled to but one bill of costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Abb. Pr. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everson-v-gehrman-nysupct-1856.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack