Everson v. Gehrman

2 Abb. Pr. 413
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1856·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Whiting, J.

Three of the defendants joined in an appeal from the special to the general term. The notice of appeal was signed by three different attorneys, and was of one appeal. The respondent’s attorneys were obliged to give notice to each of the attorneys, and although there was but one set of papers, one argument, and one judgment, he claims three separate and full bills of costs.

I think there was but one appeal, and the respondent is entitled to but one bill of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Everson v. Gehrman, 2 Abb. Pr. 413 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1856).

2 Abb. Pr. 413 (Everson v. Gehrman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sweet v. City of Syracuse
20 N.Y.S. 924 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)