Everson v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.
71 F. 570, 18 C.C.A. 251, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1636
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 10, 1896·No. No. 6·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Notwithstanding the thorough and very able argument submitted on behalf of the appellant, we are fully satisfied with the action of the court below, and with the reasoning by which it was supported. The remarks of appellant’s counsel in criticism of the opinion of the learned judge have had our attentive consideration, but have failed to convince us that it does not sufficiently maintain his conclusion. Therefore, the decree of the circuit court is, upon the opinion there filed, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Everson v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 71 F. 570, 18 C.C.A. 251, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1636 (3d Cir. 1896).
71 F. 570 (Everson v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gourley v. Northwestern Nat. Life Ins. Co.
1923 OK 682 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Townsend v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
183 Ill. App. 326 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1913)
Grieb v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
189 F. 498 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1911)
Brown v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.
142 F. 835 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1906)
Polk v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n
137 F. 273 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1905)