Everson v. Doughton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1883

DAVID K. EVERSON; PATRICIA M. EVERSON,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

RICHARD L. DOUGHTON, Individually and In His Official Capacity as Justice of the Superior Court of Alleghany/Rockingham County, North Carolina,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:08-cv-00887-JAB-PTS)

Submitted: January 22, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David K. Everson, Patricia M. Everson, Appellants Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David K. and Patricia M. Everson appeal the district

court’s orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights

action, denying their motion for recusal, and issuing a

pre-filing injunction against them. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court in both its orders, as well

as the judgment, dated July 15, 2009. Everson v. Doughton, No.

1:08-cv-00887-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. July 15, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED