Everson v. Albright
635 S.E.2d 591, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 858, 2006 WL 2474507
This text of 635 S.E.2d 591 (Everson v. Albright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Everson v. Albright, 635 S.E.2d 591, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 858, 2006 WL 2474507 (N.C. 2006).
Opinion
"Plainitff-Petitiner's Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus is denied pursuant to Rule 34 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure as a frivolous filing. Plaintiff-Petitioner is no longer allowed to file pro se in this civil matter before the Court. Any future filing in this matter by Plaintiff-Petitioner which is not accompanied by a certification signed by a licensed North Carolina attorney, who is in good standing with the North Carolina State Bar, verifying Plaintiff-Petitioner's claims are of merit and not frivolous, will not be processed.
Furthermore, pursuant to Rule 34, we remand this matter to Rockingham County for a hearing to determine sanctions, if appropriate. By order of the Court in Conference this the 17th day of August 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
635 S.E.2d 591, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 858, 2006 WL 2474507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everson-v-albright-nc-2006.