Eversharp, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Incorporated

374 F.2d 511, 153 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 91, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7194
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 6, 1967
Docket10815
StatusPublished

This text of 374 F.2d 511 (Eversharp, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eversharp, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Incorporated, 374 F.2d 511, 153 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 91, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7194 (4th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal concerns the validity and infringement of U. S. Letters Patent No. 3,071,857 covering the Schick single edge safety razor blade manufactured by Ever-sharp. The manufacturer sued Philip Morris, claiming that the defendant’s Pal and Personna safety razor blades infringed its patent. In an incisive and well reasoned opinion, the District Court held plaintiff’s patent invalid and not infringed. After carefully considering each of the appellant’s arguments, we find ourselves in complete agreement with the District Court and adopt its opinion as our own.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 F.2d 511, 153 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 91, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eversharp-inc-v-philip-morris-incorporated-ca4-1967.