Evers v. KITOMER CORPORATION

Missouri Court of Appeals

Evers v. KITOMER CORPORATION

190 S.W.3d 564, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 589, 2006 WL 1147658

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 2, 2006

DocketED 86685

StatusPublished

This text of 190 S.W.3d 564 (Evers v. KITOMER CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evers v. KITOMER CORPORATION, 190 S.W.3d 564, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 589, 2006 WL 1147658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lydia Evers (“Evers”) appeals from the decision of Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”), after the Commission affirmed the decision of the Division of Employment Security denying Evers’ petition for unemployment benefits following her termination for her employer, Kitomer Corporation.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and Appellant’s brief, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would *565 have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lydia Evers (“Evers”) appeals from the decision of Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”), after the Commission affirmed the decision of the Division of Employment Security denying Evers’ petition for unemployment benefits following her termination for her employer, Kitomer Corporation.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and Appellant’s brief, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would *565 have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 S.W.3d 564, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 589, 2006 WL 1147658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evers-v-kitomer-corporation-moctapp-2006.