Evers v. KITOMER CORPORATION

Missouri Court of Appeals

Evers v. KITOMER CORPORATION

190 S.W.3d 564, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 589, 2006 WL 1147658

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 2, 2006·No. ED 86685·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lydia Evers (“Evers”) appeals from the decision of Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”), after the Commission affirmed the decision of the Division of Employment Security denying Evers’ petition for unemployment benefits following her termination for her employer, Kitomer Corporation.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and Appellant’s brief, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would *565 have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lydia Evers (“Evers”) appeals from the decision of Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”), after the Commission affirmed the decision of the Division of Employment Security denying Evers’ petition for unemployment benefits following her termination for her employer, Kitomer Corporation.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and Appellant’s brief, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would *565 have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Evers v. KITOMER CORPORATION, 190 S.W.3d 564, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 589, 2006 WL 1147658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

190 S.W.3d 564 (Evers v. KITOMER CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.